Standard Recommends Evolution from Tag-Centric to Tower-Centric System
NEW YORK (PROTEXT) - The Consumer Products Manufacturers
Association, Inc. (CPMA) proposed today that the packaged goods
industry consider a "tower-centric" approach to developing a
global, product-security standard.
"In a nutshell, this approach breaks the old paradigm; it
truly changes the rules of the game," said Vic Wasilov, Eastman
Kodak Company's representative on the CPMA's Steering Committee.
"We believe this approach can deliver far better on the
flexibility, performance and price scales than all other options
reviewed, to date."
Background
In March -- when the CPMA was launched as an alliance between
Kodak, Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble -- the group was
focused on developing a set of standard, performance-based
specifications for security "tags."
These tags -- which are affixed to various product packages to
discourage shoplifting -- use one of three, distinct
technologies, either radio-frequency (RF), acousto magnetic (AM)
or electromagnetic (EM). Once embedded in a tag, each of these
technologies is designed to interact with compatible "towers," or
detection devices, posted at store exits. If shoppers pay for
their merchandise, the tags are "turned off" or deactivated at
the cash register. However, if shoppers attempt to leave a store
without paying for their merchandise, the tags remain "active."
In turn, these active tags are read by the towers, triggering a
store alarm. To date, towers have been designed to read one type
of tag -- for instance, EM towers can not currently read RF or AM
tags.
A comprehensive analysis of these technology options persuaded
the CPMA members to look beyond the tags -- to consider, instead,
the combined tag-tower system.
Wasilov explained: "If we take a tag-centric approach to
developing a security standard, we are forced to select one of
the three leading technologies -- RF, EM or AM. Each of these has
its own list of benefits, and in some cases, those benefits are
singular to that technology -- what one technology offers, the
others may or may not be able to provide."
"Further," Wasilov continued, "each of these technologies
works best with certain products and packages. For instance,
'Technology X' may be the best option for blow-molded packages or
magnetic media; while 'Technology Y' and 'Technology Z' are the
best options for other package and product types. Thus, if the
packaged-goods industry selects only one of these technologies
over the others, it would not be doing what is best for all
products, packages, manufacturers and retailers."
In contrast, Wasilov said that creating towers which read
multiple types of tags "will clearly open the door to new
possibilities," among them:
* Manufacturers can select the right tags for their products
* A greater number and broader range of packages can be
tagged
* Manufacturers and retailers can rest assured that
regardless of
the product or tag, the in-store security systems will be
able
to read those tags.
Complicating the Shoplifters' Job
Pat Rizzotto -- Johnson & Johnson's representative on the
CPMA's Steering Committee -- said another important, potential
benefit of the tower-centric concept is complicating the efforts
of would-be shoplifters.
He explained: "Today, the professional thief can foil one type
of tag using one technique, but has to use a different technique
to foil a different type of tag. Thus, if security towers can
read multiple technologies, rather than just one, shoplifting
will clearly become much more difficult."
This scenario takes on added value if tags can be universally
applied inside product packages, so the professional thief
doesn't even know which technology he's up against.
Rizzotto said the CPMA will continue to make the discreet
placement of security tags one of its primary design goals: "In
fact, we want to emphasize here that the shift to a tower-centric
approach does not mean the CPMA will discontinue any of the work
we have planned for tag specifications. To the contrary -- our
design goals for tag specifications, announced earlier this year
-- are still relevant. Again, this revised direction simply
broadens our mission to look at the combined tag-tower system --
to develop standard specifications for both components in that
system."
Beyond discreet placement, the CPMA's other design goals for
tag specifications include: equal access at a reasonable cost;
accommodation of future technological advances; minimized
adjustments to current systems; in-line application; and a
multifunctional capability (anti-shoplifting plus anti-
counterfeiting plus information management).
Simplifying the Path to Consensus
Rizzotto said the CPMA members also believe that a tower-
centric approach will make the task of reaching global consensus
much easier.
He explained that, in the United States, the market is roughly
split between RF and AM technologies. In Europe, the market is
largely dominated by EM technology. Thus, selecting one
technology over the others could cause significant disruption. In
contrast, by pursuing a path that accommodates multiple
technologies, the adjustment will be easier, more natural and
evolutionary: "Under this broadened, tower-centric concept,
retailers would not feel pressure to immediately upgrade or
change-out their towers -- those towers would continue to work
with corresponding tags. Instead, retailers could wait to expand
their tower capabilities until that point in time when it made
the best economic sense for them."
To this point, Larry Kellam -- P&G's representative on the
CPMA's Steering Committee -- added that the group also plans to
evaluate what might be done to upgrade both current and future
towers: "The ideal solution would be one that offered a 'plug-
and-play' alternative -- where certain components could be added
to either the towers you already have, or to the towers you
purchase a year from now, to broaden the range of technologies
they can detect."
Enhancing Performance, Reducing Costs, Sparking Innovation
Kellam said the tower-centric approach can also lead to
improvements in both system performance and price.
"By establishing a holistic standard for the combined tag-
tower system," he said, "system and component vendors can better
focus their R&D efforts on ways to make that unified standard
perform at consistently higher levels, and at consistently better
price points. In fact, by moving in this direction, the industry
could spark a whole new generation of R&D behind both the
hardware and software that will first make the system work, and
that second, will help it expand and adapt to future
technological advances. The possibilities are virtually endless."
Looking Forward
Kellam acknowledged that the CPMA does not have yet have a
complete "blueprint" for its tower-centric model: "However, we
are convinced -- based on the impressive and comprehensive work
already done by our technical partner, NovaVision -- that this
concept is entirely viable. Now, we need input from many other
groups to help us kick the tires on this model and complete the
specifications that will make it come to life."
Kellam said that, in the weeks ahead, this technology
direction will be a central point of discussion with industry and
trade associations, among others. He invited anyone who wants to
offer feedback -- or to request a more detailed briefing on the
tower-centric model -- to contact the CPMA through its website at
www.cpma-global.org , where email links to CPMA administrative
staff are provided. ots Original Text Service: The Consumer
Products Manufacturers Association, Inc. Internet:
http://www.newsaktuell.de Contact: Jack Farmer, 314-982-8630, or
Pete Abel, 314-982-9153, both for The Consumer Products
Manufacturers Association, Inc. Web site:
http://www.cpma-global.org
Subscribers please note that material bearing the slug
"PROTEXT" is not part of CTK's news service and is not to be
published under the "CTK" slug. Protext is a commercial service
providing distribution of press releases from clients, who are
identified in the text of Protext reports and who bear full
responsibility for their contents.
PROTEXT